The title and supporting elements imply all data and details have equal weight. For communicative, state your data story and use supporting elements to create a visual path.

The title clearly states a data story to follow. Guide viewers from most important to supporting details through font size and boldness and choice of colors.

Don’t change the scale as it would make comparison difficult.

Keep the scale the same across small multiples.

The font size used for the axes label is too small, which makes it difficult to read. Smaller font size makes it illegible on some of the platforms.

Make sure to use at least 12 px (9 pt) font size to make the text more readable for desktop. Read more about accessibility in our resource section. By clearing visual clutter, using simple, sans-serif fonts, and simple visual elements (no 3D or drop-shadows, for example). the viewer can easily focus on the data.

There is not enough contrast between the grid and the lines, effectively making grids invisible. Without the grid it becomes difficult to compare data across the groups.

There is enough contrast between the grid and the lines. The grid makes it easy to compare data across different groups. Non-text contrast ratio of at least 3:1 is suggested for accessibility by WCAG 2.1. (See Resources for color accessibility sites.)

Make sure that the grid cells share the same quantitative domains, in this case from 65 - 75.

Try to create the reference lines and scales which cover most of the categories, few exceptions would be fine. For eg. in this case, Saskatchewan goes out of the reference lines